I voted for Ilhan Omar in 2018. I have mixed feelings regarding her House tenure thus far. I’m very proud of what she represents, but sometimes unsure about how she’s representing. But while she certainly has her flaws, and is still self-admittedly learning and growing, Ilhan Omar and her three “Squad” colleagues deserve every American’s defense against the recent verbal attacks that they’ve suffered from the Twitter-fingers of the president.
To rehash: In a recent tweet regarding these four Congresswomen, Donald Trump said, “So interesting to see “Progressive” Democrat Congresswomen, who originally come from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe, the worst, most corrupt and inept anywhere in the world…now loudly and viciously telling the people of the United States, the greatest and most powerful Nation on earth, how our government is to be run. Why don’t they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. Then come back and show us how it is done.”
Before moving forward, it is worth noting that only one of these four women (Omar) is foreign-born, and all of them are American citizens.
And that was just the beginning. As the Twitter war ensued, and expanded into other mediums, Trump proceeded to call these four women, and Ilhan Omar in particular, “disgraceful,” “disgusting”, “Radical Leftists”, “Communists”, “Anti-Semitic”, “Anti-America”, “pro-terrorist”, “racist”, mislabelers of racism in others, and perhaps most prominently, people who “HATE our country.”
Specifically in regards to Omar, there are shreds of sentiments that I agree with in these otherwise intolerant statements. I agree that Omar is “radical”, in the sense that her views oftentimes fail to reflect the recognition of complexity and nuance that I believe is necessary to describe our reality. I agree that certain comments from Omar indeed fall under the category of “anti-Semitic”, or at the very least, unknowingly rhyme with anti-Semitic tropes. I agree that “racist” is a word that is thrown around far too loosely by many on the progressive left, and that more nuanced language is needed to describe the differing perceptions of racial reality possessed by the modern American public.
That last sentiment is why I will once again stop short of labeling Trump as a racist. I still do not believe that Trump harbors real hatred in his heart for Somalis, Latinos, or any other “race” of people. Instead, I prefer to call Trump “racially ignorant”. I really do think that he is almost completely unaware of the racially charged language that he uses. That or he purposefully uses that language as a tool to try to rile up the real racists in his base. It’s not textbook “racism”, but it is still hugely troubling.
As noted, Ilhan Omar has made some ignorant and discriminatory statements herself, specifically in regards to Jewish people. The big difference between her and Trump is in their reactions. Omar unknowingly played on anti-Semitic tropes in statements that she made regarding pro-Israeli lobbyists. She was officially disavowed by her Democratic colleagues in Congress for those statements, and in return, offered a seemingly genuine apology in which she claimed to be “listening and learning,” and thanked her “Jewish allies and colleagues” for “educating [her] on the painful history” of anti-Semitism.
Trump, on the other hand, doesn’t see a need for listening or learning. Trump is constantly offering up coded language about blacks, Latinos, Muslims, and other historically marginalized groups, and when confronted about it, does not apologize, but instead chooses to double-down. In this most recent case against Omar and her women of color colleagues, Dems are again proposing an official disavowal of Trump’s hateful language, much like they did with Omar. Most Republicans are conspicuously silent.
And this seems to validate one of Trump’s primary defenses: “People agree with me”—the idea that since many Americans agree with Trump’s less-than enlightened reflections, that that makes those reflections okay. There is no sentiment that gives me less faith in our democracy than this one.
I have been a consistent opponent of the calls for President Trump’s impeachment on the grounds that, 1) The Mueller Report found insufficient evidence regarding the initial crimes that is was called upon to investigate, and 2) Despite potential obstructions of justice, I’d rather see Trump defeated democratically via our election process. That said, this particular Trump statement, as well as myriad other statements that I have heard personally and impersonally from Trump supporters, makes me worry that we still live in country in which a significant amount of people will vote for Donald Trump not IN SPITE OF the racist things he says, but BECAUSE of them. I don’t think that represents the majority of our country, but as the 2016 election proved, Trump doesn’t need a majority to win a second term.
Ironically, Trump won that 2016 election on a four-word slogan, “Make America Great Again”—a slogan that suggests that 2016 Donald Trump was dissatisfied with the state of affairs of his country at that time. Over the last few days, many have pointed out the inconsistency and hypocrisy between this slogan and the accusations of anti-Americanism that Trump has hurled towards the four Congresswomen. “Make America Great Again” doesn’t seem to suggest a love for our country as it is, nor a patriotism towards the diverse, multicultural nation that the United States has become, an element of our country that many people love. Instead, much like many of the comments of Omar, Ocasio-Cortez, Pressley, and Tlaib, “Make America Great Again” represents a criticism of certain aspects of our country. “Make America Great Again” is an expression of dissent.
But I’m not here to condemn dissent. On the contrary, I firmly subscribe to the belief that dissent is one of the highest forms of patriotism that one can express—that if you truly love your country, but are unsatisfied or displeased with certain characteristics that it holds or actions that it performs, you do not passively accept those flaws, but instead, challenge your country to be better. Ilhan Omar seems to understand this. As she said yesterday, the provocative statements that she has made do not come from a place of hate, they come from “a place of extreme love.”
That is why Ilhan Omar and her allies are so valuable in our Congress. It is not because their dissent is always righteous or always right, but because it gives us a perspective that our democracy has so often lacked. From women. From people of color. From the sons and daughters of the foreign born, or those born abroad themselves. For groups that this country has historically failed, and in some ways, continues to fail today. These are perspectives that are always worth considering. Trump is not evil for lacking these perspectives, but he might be for his refusal to understand them.